Save me repeating what I just posted over in the MSTS-2 Forum, have a look at this:
[Link Expired]
There still is not the degree of Perfection I was hoping to see in a TRAIN SIM, improving on what MSTS-1 can do. The Functionality in the Scenery and Driver Modes is great, the SURVEYOR easier to work with, but I miss the Quality and Variety of Track Systems, easy to get hold of and better organised for Route Builders by David Beach.
Despite a more advanced Graphics Engine, Quality of Display does not compare with MSTS. The first shot is from TZ-RS2004's OTTO-TEST Route and the second from the MSTS-1.1 N.&.J.C., Warbonnet from 3D-Trains. This comparison says it all.
O t t o
[Link Expired]
[Link Expired]
[Link Expired]
There still is not the degree of Perfection I was hoping to see in a TRAIN SIM, improving on what MSTS-1 can do. The Functionality in the Scenery and Driver Modes is great, the SURVEYOR easier to work with, but I miss the Quality and Variety of Track Systems, easy to get hold of and better organised for Route Builders by David Beach.
Despite a more advanced Graphics Engine, Quality of Display does not compare with MSTS. The first shot is from TZ-RS2004's OTTO-TEST Route and the second from the MSTS-1.1 N.&.J.C., Warbonnet from 3D-Trains. This comparison says it all.
O t t o
[Link Expired]
[Link Expired]
Comment