Who is Rail Simulation? This is not a question about the shape of rails or the tone of a whistle. Nor is it relevant to AI failure and program crashes. It is about the company itself. We have seen some financials produced to comply with UK law. Each can draw their own conclusions on those. No, it is none of these questions. Instead it is about the intentions and plans of Rail Simulation and its customer support..
Today we have thousands of people who have purchased one or both of their products and perhaps some addons as well. Will Rail Simulation support these products in a manner that meets the expectations of these customers? Each owner of the product should examine the support that used to be received BRW(Before Rail Works). Many, will have found the new support polcy quite adequate and meeting most of their needs. They have strong confidence that Rail Simulation will further address their remaining concerns.
Others are moderately upset with the support but have faith that eventually most, if not all, will be addressed satisfactorily.
Then the third group, smaller than the other two, has more extensive needs and some who do not believe their issues are being met.
Within each group is one common thread and that is the almost total lack of information regarding the commitments of Rail Simulation to the Rail Works product. Even the first group, who are well satisfied would probably like to know what advances and addons are planned for them. Others are plainly irritated by no information either about plans for an addon, new features or fixes for problems. The company is simply stonewalling in these more substantive areas.
The rule for no dialog with customers is the practice installed by Paul Jackson the big boss aka CEO, a title revered by thousands of minor business managers. His focus on the bottom line believes that customer dialog is time consuming and the return is not as great as spending that time on addons. I hope that he does not pay himself for that bit of wisdom.
Presently we do not know what the staffing level is nor their skill sets. Oh, many have guessed in an authoritative manner but they do not know either. This practice of absolute minimal customer dialog is said, by forum members, to be the norm in the gaming software world. We are encouraged to adjust to the practice and move on. For those who are unfamiliar with the gaming world, and may come from the more professional ranks of commercial software products, find this silence to be quite frustrating. Customers are sending money (thru purchases) and problem reports into a company that does what? Just what is Rail Simulation doing in terms fixing problems? Which problems do they commit to fix? Which problems will be addressed but take more time? Which features which are partially implemented will be taken to their projected conclusion or will some be set forever as they are today? Will any major new features be added? Will a new release be issued to pay for these new features? And, the list goes on.
But, the answers are never given.
Today we have thousands of people who have purchased one or both of their products and perhaps some addons as well. Will Rail Simulation support these products in a manner that meets the expectations of these customers? Each owner of the product should examine the support that used to be received BRW(Before Rail Works). Many, will have found the new support polcy quite adequate and meeting most of their needs. They have strong confidence that Rail Simulation will further address their remaining concerns.
Others are moderately upset with the support but have faith that eventually most, if not all, will be addressed satisfactorily.
Then the third group, smaller than the other two, has more extensive needs and some who do not believe their issues are being met.
Within each group is one common thread and that is the almost total lack of information regarding the commitments of Rail Simulation to the Rail Works product. Even the first group, who are well satisfied would probably like to know what advances and addons are planned for them. Others are plainly irritated by no information either about plans for an addon, new features or fixes for problems. The company is simply stonewalling in these more substantive areas.
The rule for no dialog with customers is the practice installed by Paul Jackson the big boss aka CEO, a title revered by thousands of minor business managers. His focus on the bottom line believes that customer dialog is time consuming and the return is not as great as spending that time on addons. I hope that he does not pay himself for that bit of wisdom.
Presently we do not know what the staffing level is nor their skill sets. Oh, many have guessed in an authoritative manner but they do not know either. This practice of absolute minimal customer dialog is said, by forum members, to be the norm in the gaming software world. We are encouraged to adjust to the practice and move on. For those who are unfamiliar with the gaming world, and may come from the more professional ranks of commercial software products, find this silence to be quite frustrating. Customers are sending money (thru purchases) and problem reports into a company that does what? Just what is Rail Simulation doing in terms fixing problems? Which problems do they commit to fix? Which problems will be addressed but take more time? Which features which are partially implemented will be taken to their projected conclusion or will some be set forever as they are today? Will any major new features be added? Will a new release be issued to pay for these new features? And, the list goes on.
But, the answers are never given.
Comment