Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SLSF (FRISCO) Springfield Sub ca. 1950

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Spitz
    replied
    Nice!! just need a little further south towards Thayer,looking good!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • jonpd
    replied
    Looking good Cade!

    Leave a comment:


  • CSXCorp
    replied
    4/23/2022

    First of all, sorry all for being gone for so long! Now the reason why was because I had issues with my old computer, and I was just recently able to upgrade. I'm finally getting around to modeling again. This project is NOT dead and I am really wanting to finish it. So, enjoy these few screens of work around Ozark I've been messing with for the past week.

    Cade

    [IMG][url=https://flic.kr/p/2nfQJEr]Screenshot (1) by Cade VerHage, on Flickr[/IMG]
    Screenshot (2) by Cade VerHage, on Flickr
    Screenshot (3) by Cade VerHage, on Flickr

    Leave a comment:


  • CSXCorp
    replied
    Jerry,

    Thanks for the information on the DEMs, that'll come in handy when I expand to the other 3 subdivisions. Also, it is always great to hear stories from railroaders (the Southern is one of my favorites). I'm glad it brings back good memories. I don't think I've really read or heard a bad thing about the Frisco or the folks that kept her running, maybe that is why the railroad is held so near and dear to the hearts of her ex-employees and fans. I know nobody was happy the day BN took over.

    Leave a comment:


  • landnrailroader
    replied
    Cade,

    If you find reliable DEMs that will work with DEMEX or whatever your extraction tool is,
    then my recommendation is to fill a DVD or two with all the DEMs you think you will
    ever need. Reason is that the USGS seems to like to change formats on a whim and
    a few years back I thought my days were done -- until I discovered VTBuilder. I
    needed a DEM module yesterday to expand a future route a little as well as do the
    DM terrain. So, I found what I needed in GeoTiff format, but this format from the
    USGS won't work with DEMEX. So, run it through VTBuilder and create a new
    GeoTiff file that works.

    As for the route, it brings back pleasant memories of getting to know some fine
    people, finest railroaders I've met up to that time. (1971) In 71,72, & 73 I,
    along with my operating crew and the Southern Geometry Car, R-1, were
    leased to the Frisco for 10 days. The Chief Engineer was a buddy of our VP
    on the SR and the roads did not compete so this was okay. We were treated
    like royalty out there and tested 400 or more miles a day. I remember that
    one one day, we left Memphis, tested to St. Louis, then to Springfield where
    we tied up for the night. Then Springfield to Monett & south to Ft. Smith & back
    which was a short day.

    J. H. Sullivan
    retired from CSX & SR
    volunteer Docent - C&TS RR

    Leave a comment:


  • CSXCorp
    replied
    1/2 Update
    First off, happy New Years everybody! I didn't realize it had been two months since my last update. The track work has been completed as I said before, but also the main road layout has now been completed. I have begun to scenerize the past week, beginning with the backdrop to the southern half of Springfield, Downtown. I have utilized many of Paul Charland's fabulous models along with other creators' buildings to create a realistic look. The Heers tower will be one model I will build myself, and I have many industries to use for practicing my modeling skills.

    MoPac tracks in foreground
    [IMG]slsf12 by Cade VerHage, on Flickr[/IMG]

    Basic industries near MK Junction, minus Harry Cooper Lumber, which I am going to build
    slsf13 by Cade VerHage, on Flickr

    Leave a comment:


  • CSXCorp
    replied
    11/4 Update

    This will probably be my last update for a bit until I get some good scenery developments but the track layout is now complete.

    [IMG]slsftv5 by Cade VerHage, on Flickr[/IMG]

    Aurora
    slsftv6 by Cade VerHage, on Flickr

    Mt Vernon
    slsftv7 by Cade VerHage, on Flickr

    Monett
    slsftv8 by Cade VerHage, on Flickr

    Leave a comment:


  • CSXCorp
    replied
    10/28 Update

    This week, I was able to lay track all the way to Monett. Next week, I am hoping to lay out all of Monett and the Mt. Vernon Branch. After that, track work will be done and I will be able to begin scenerizing the route.

    [IMG]slsftv4 by Cade VerHage, on Flickr[/IMG]

    Leave a comment:


  • CSXCorp
    replied
    Originally posted by Orbita View Post
    This is really coming along, Cade. Glad to see some more progress shots!
    Thank you Orbita!

    Leave a comment:


  • Orbita
    replied
    This is really coming along, Cade. Glad to see some more progress shots!

    Leave a comment:


  • CSXCorp
    replied
    10/21 update

    Just finished laying the Springfield track layout. Next to do is the Ozark Branch then I will begin working towards Monett.

    Overview of current tracks
    [IMG]slsftv1 by Cade VerHage, on Flickr[/IMG]
    Springfield close up
    [IMG]slsftv2 by Cade VerHage, on Flickr[/IMG]
    Kansas Ave Yard Closeup
    [IMG]slsftv3 by Cade VerHage, on Flickr[/IMG]

    Leave a comment:


  • CSXCorp
    replied
    Originally posted by Coonskin View Post
    DEM's:

    Good deal. Over the years I've watched some new route builders lose heart when they discover DEM's are available... and they've got umpteen hours in a billiard table (no DEM) route that simply can't be converted to DEM's without a huge loss of work.
    That would definitely be awful. I've known about DEMs for years so I made sure grabbing them was the first thing I did before anything else.

    Leave a comment:


  • Coonskin
    replied
    DEM's:

    Good deal. Over the years I've watched some new route builders lose heart when they discover DEM's are available... and they've got umpteen hours in a billiard table (no DEM) route that simply can't be converted to DEM's without a huge loss of work.

    Leave a comment:


  • CSXCorp
    replied
    Originally posted by Coonskin View Post
    Hello Cade!

    Any Frisco-based route is a welcomed addition.

    Are you using Digital Elevation Models (DEM) on your route? If not, you will lack the prototype's terrain setting.
    Hello Coonskin! I am actually, from the same source I found data for my KCO&S route, webgis.com I believe.

    Leave a comment:


  • Coonskin
    replied
    Hello Cade!

    Any Frisco-based route is a welcomed addition.

    Are you using Digital Elevation Models (DEM) on your route? If not, you will lack the prototype's terrain setting.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X