A Very Hinckley Summer (2023)

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ZachBell4400
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2017
    • 406
    • Little Falls, MN
    • American English
    • ORTS

    #1

    A Very Hinckley Summer (2023)

    A pair of FXE ACe's lead the H-SUPKCK.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by ZachBell4400; 06-29-2023, 17:57. Reason: Edit Error
  • ebnertra000
    Senior Member

    • Jun 2013
    • 1740
    • Minnesota

    #2
    Neat image!

    Needs more haze, though

    Comment

    • ZachBell4400
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2017
      • 406
      • Little Falls, MN
      • American English
      • ORTS

      #3
      TRAVIS,True, needs the Canadian smoke you folks been breathing in.

      Comment

      • BrandonS261
        Senior Member

        • Apr 2019
        • 214

        #4
        I may need to add a few shots in this thread once I get the Hinckley area done on the mega route

        Comment

        • ZachBell4400
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2017
          • 406
          • Little Falls, MN
          • American English
          • ORTS

          #5
          I'd love to see the Hinckley area completed too. As well as the I-35 corridor I just did a separate deal here with the Hinckley Sub being it's not built all the way down to Coon Creek or all the way up to Boylston, WI.

          Comment

          • BrandonS261
            Senior Member

            • Apr 2019
            • 214

            #6
            I built the whole route on my Midwest Mega Route. Including the Lake Superior Railroad Museum trackage. Only Tracks are fully completed and Roads are done for most of the route from Northtown Yard to Boylston Jct.

            Comment

            • ZachBell4400
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2017
              • 406
              • Little Falls, MN
              • American English
              • ORTS

              #7
              A southbound O-TSRP unit coke empty heads southbound through Hinckley, MN.

              Comment

              • ZachBell4400
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2017
                • 406
                • Little Falls, MN
                • American English
                • ORTS

                #8
                The northbound H-NTWSUP (or the Nutsoup as the railfanners call it) heads north with three SD40-2's (1687, 1619, and 1692) and a former ATSF GP60 (#160).

                Comment

                • eric
                  Owner/Admin


                  • Dec 2002
                  • 8449
                  • MP36 UPRR Harvard Subdivision
                  • English, SQL
                  • General

                  #9
                  BrandonS261 I may have to send you some ore docks and an ore carrier...
                  If you like what you see here at Trainsim.com, be it the discussions and knowledge in the forums, items saved in our library or the ongoing development of our TSRE Fork, I hope you'll consider a paid membership to help support keeping the site operating.... Thanks!

                  Comment

                  • ZachBell4400
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2017
                    • 406
                    • Little Falls, MN
                    • American English
                    • ORTS

                    #10
                    That would something useful for the CN Missabe route if constructed. I might work on that sooner or later depending on my work schedule once I finish up my east sector of the Northern Transcon running from Staples Yard to Northtown Yard in Minneapolis, MN.

                    Comment

                    • eric
                      Owner/Admin


                      • Dec 2002
                      • 8449
                      • MP36 UPRR Harvard Subdivision
                      • English, SQL
                      • General

                      #11
                      I modeled the wood dock at Escanaba but it's easily modified to a concrete dock.
                      If you like what you see here at Trainsim.com, be it the discussions and knowledge in the forums, items saved in our library or the ongoing development of our TSRE Fork, I hope you'll consider a paid membership to help support keeping the site operating.... Thanks!

                      Comment

                      • BrandonS261
                        Senior Member

                        • Apr 2019
                        • 214

                        #12
                        ZachBell4400 Why don't we team up and work on the Hinckley, Staples and Duluth/Superior area together? I already have the trackage and most of the roads complete for the Hinckley Sub done and the Staples Sub done out to St Could, MN The Duluth and Superior areas all have to be rebuilt but would be its own separate route.I also have the Brainard Sub built as well but plan on rebuilding that and hooking up the Staples Sub to it at Staples, MN.

                        There is no point to build routes that are already out and if there are two routes that are the same that are both being built it would make more sense in teaming up to build it together.

                        I am already in the process of splitting up the mega route into sections and my plan was to have the Staples, Hinckley and Brainard Sub in one route. Then have the Duluth/Superior area and the NSSR a separate route.

                        The ore ships and ore dock would be a great addition to the Superior and Duluth area route.

                        Brandon

                        Comment

                        • ZachBell4400
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2017
                          • 406
                          • Little Falls, MN
                          • American English
                          • ORTS

                          #13
                          Originally posted by BrandonS261
                          [USER="287354"]ZachBell4400[/USER I am already in the process of splitting up the mega route into sections and my plan was to have the Staples, Hinckley and Brainard Sub in one route. Then have the Duluth/Superior area and the NSSR a separate route.
                          Sure thing Brandon! DM me sometime and I can surely work on it for you! I've lived in Little Falls since 2015 and I'm used to seeing all the trains heading through here.

                          Comment

                          • anderson martins
                            Senior Member
                            • Feb 2005
                            • 511
                            • belo horizonte, minas gerais, brasil

                            #14
                            Originally posted by BrandonS261
                            ZachBell4400 Why don't we team up and work on the Hinckley, Staples and Duluth/Superior area together? I already have the trackage and most of the roads complete for the Hinckley Sub done and the Staples Sub done out to St Could, MN The Duluth and Superior areas all have to be rebuilt but would be its own separate route.I also have the Brainard Sub built as well but plan on rebuilding that and hooking up the Staples Sub to it at Staples, MN.

                            There is no point to build routes that are already out and if there are two routes that are the same that are both being built it would make more sense in teaming up to build it together.

                            I am already in the process of splitting up the mega route into sections and my plan was to have the Staples, Hinckley and Brainard Sub in one route. Then have the Duluth/Superior area and the NSSR a separate route.

                            The ore ships and ore dock would be a great addition to the Superior and Duluth area route.

                            Brandon
                            Good idea huh!!
                            If you have a ship and docks, you must have ore unloading equipment - CADUMPER

                            I've never seen one here on this forum.

                            it would be a new thing in an old group with new ideas​ @ZachBell4400BrandonS261
                            Chimbica Dash8

                            Comment

                            • eric
                              Owner/Admin


                              • Dec 2002
                              • 8449
                              • MP36 UPRR Harvard Subdivision
                              • English, SQL
                              • General

                              #15
                              The ore docks on Lake Superior are gravity feed. Cars go up top and dump into a hold which is 30+ feet above water level, and those holds are in turn emptied via chutes into the ship's hold. It's almost a 100 year old process.

                              There is a more modern ground level dock in Escanaba on Lake Michigan which has a conveyer loading system. This replaced two older gravity piers - one was lost to a fire and the other decommissioned. That modern pier is now idle/dormant, as CN is no longer unloading ore or pellets at that location. Ore from upper Michigan is now either being loaded out in Duluth or Marquette, or is moving all-rail from the mine/plant to the steel mills.
                              If you like what you see here at Trainsim.com, be it the discussions and knowledge in the forums, items saved in our library or the ongoing development of our TSRE Fork, I hope you'll consider a paid membership to help support keeping the site operating.... Thanks!

                              Comment

                              Working...