Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 48

Thread: SimRail - Currently Repetitive

  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    S.W.WALES
    Posts
    4,483

    Default

    No idea what checkpoint based, means. Sounds like a fudge to me, so they can stick it.

    Mike.
    Yma O Hyd

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Yamba, N.S.WALES, Australia
    Posts
    4,871

    Default

    The list does not include ..... bug-fixes
    Does that mean that you are not working on fixing bugs or that you are fixing them but haven't included that on the list?
    IBM XT i386; 512Kb RAM; 5.25" FDD; 1.4Mb FDD; 5Mb HDD; VGA 256-colour graphics card; AdLib soundcard; DR DOS 6.0; Windows 3.0

  3. #33
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    S.W.WALES
    Posts
    4,483

    Default

    They are fixing bugs, Bruce. As long as they are MP bugs of course

    Mike.
    Yma O Hyd

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Languages
    English, SQL
    Posts
    5,938

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by haverfordwest View Post
    No idea what checkpoint based, means.

    Mike.
    Just guessing but I think they have predetermined points where a save would roll back to. Not a bad idea, actually, because you can flush out events from memory.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    S.W.WALES
    Posts
    4,483

    Default

    Still means you always have to play to certain points on a route though buddy.

    Which is not always convenient.

    Mike.
    Yma O Hyd

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Languages
    English, SQL
    Posts
    5,938

    Default

    Agree that as a user it's not convenient to have to reach a certain point in the game to be able to resume it later.

    As a developer, I can see how they might see checkpoints as a compromise that can be quickly implemented.

    And... that's assuming I'm reading what they meant by checkpoint correctly.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Yamba, N.S.WALES, Australia
    Posts
    4,871

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by haverfordwest View Post
    Still means you always have to play to certain points on a route though buddy.

    Which is not always convenient.

    Mike.
    Agreed.
    I don't like games which have "Make it to here and you can Save!" as the method.

    Quick saves are the way to go, as a minimum: each save does so on top of the previous save. No accumulation of saves, only ever the one.
    IBM XT i386; 512Kb RAM; 5.25" FDD; 1.4Mb FDD; 5Mb HDD; VGA 256-colour graphics card; AdLib soundcard; DR DOS 6.0; Windows 3.0

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    S.W.WALES
    Posts
    4,483

    Default

    Fair points Eric, maybe they are incapable of an on the fly save system.

    No i don't either Bruce, i like auto saves which you can set intervals for in the setup options.

    Backed up with a manual save option, by the player.

    Quite a few games i own use that system buddy.

    Mike.
    Yma O Hyd

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Swindon, England
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Really depends how they base the checkpoints. If it's station calls then you might still be limited if the time between stations exceeds what you have available. They could be going down the Snowrunner route of having a time interval save but really in this day and age there is no excuse for any game claiming to be a simulator not offering an unrestrained save system.
    Vern.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    S.W.WALES
    Posts
    4,483

    Default

    Yup needs to be player controlled really. I was just running in MP, with auto pilot. Seems to be a hell of a lot of the route, that is just trees and bushes etc at line side.

    Mike.
    Yma O Hyd

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •